expect-type

Compile-time tests for types. Useful to make sure types don't regress into being overly permissive as changes go in over time.

Similar to expect, but with type-awareness. Gives you access to several type-matchers that let you make assertions about the form of a reference or generic type parameter.

1import {expectTypeOf} from 'expect-type'
2import {foo, bar} from '../foo'
3
4// make sure `foo` has type {a: number}
5expectTypeOf(foo).toMatchTypeOf<{a: number}>()
6
7// make sure `bar` is a function taking a string:
8expectTypeOf(bar).parameter(0).toBeString()
9expectTypeOf(bar).returns.not.toBeAny()

It can be used in your existing test files (and is actually built in to vitest). Or it can be used in any other type-checked file you'd like - it's built into existing tooling with no dependencies. No extra build step, cli tool, IDE extension, or lint plugin is needed. Just import the function and start writing tests. Failures will be at compile time - they'll appear in your IDE and when you run tsc.

See below for lots more examples.

Contents

• Contents
• Installation and usage
• Documentation
  • Features
  • Why is my assertion failing?
  • Where is .toMatchTypeOf?
  • Internal type helpers
  • Error messages
    • Concrete "expected" objects vs type arguments
  • Overloaded functions
  • Within test frameworks
  • Vitest
    • Jest & eslint-plugin-jest
  • Limitations
• Similar projects
  • Comparison
• TypeScript backwards-compatibility
• Contributing
  • Documentation of limitations through tests

Installation and usage

1npm install expect-type --save-dev

1import {expectTypeOf} from 'expect-type'

Documentation

The expectTypeOf method takes a single argument or a generic type parameter. Neither it nor the functions chained off its return value have any meaningful runtime behaviour. The assertions you write will be compile-time errors if they don't hold true.

Features

Check an object's type with .toEqualTypeOf:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: number}>()

.toEqualTypeOf can check that two concrete objects have equivalent types (note: when these assertions fail, the error messages can be less informative vs the generic type argument syntax above - see error messages docs):

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf({a: 1})

.toEqualTypeOf succeeds for objects with different values, but the same type:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf({a: 2})

.toEqualTypeOf fails on excess properties:

1// @ts-expect-error
2expectTypeOf({a: 1, b: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: number}>()

To allow for extra properties on an object type, use .toMatchObjectType. This is a strict check, but only on the subset of keys that are in the expected type:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1, b: 1}).toMatchObjectType<{a: number}>()

.toMatchObjectType can check partial matches on deeply nested objects:

1const user = {
2  email: 'a@b.com',
3  name: 'John Doe',
4  address: {street: '123 2nd St', city: 'New York', zip: '10001', state: 'NY', country: 'USA'},
5}
6
7expectTypeOf(user).toMatchObjectType<{name: string; address: {city: string}}>()

To check that a type extends another type, use .toExtend:

1expectTypeOf('some string').toExtend<string | boolean>()
2// @ts-expect-error
3expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toExtend<{b: number}>()

.toExtend can be used with object types, but .toMatchObjectType is usually a better choice when dealing with objects, since it's stricter:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1, b: 2}).toExtend<{a: number}>() // avoid this
2expectTypeOf({a: 1, b: 2}).toMatchObjectType<{a: number}>() // prefer this

.toEqualTypeOf, .toMatchObjectType, and .toExtend all fail on missing properties:

1// @ts-expect-error
2expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: number; b: number}>()
3// @ts-expect-error
4expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toMatchObjectType<{a: number; b: number}>()
5// @ts-expect-error
6expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toExtend<{a: number; b: number}>()

Another example of the difference between .toExtend, .toMatchObjectType, and .toEqualTypeOf. .toExtend can be used for "is-a" relationships:

1type Fruit = {type: 'Fruit'; edible: boolean}
2type Apple = {type: 'Fruit'; name: 'Apple'; edible: true}
3
4expectTypeOf<Apple>().toExtend<Fruit>()
5
6// @ts-expect-error - the `editable` property isn't an exact match. In `Apple`, it's `true`, which extends `boolean`, but they're not identical.
7expectTypeOf<Apple>().toMatchObjectType<Fruit>()
8
9// @ts-expect-error - Apple is not an identical type to Fruit, it's a subtype
10expectTypeOf<Apple>().toEqualTypeOf<Fruit>()
11
12// @ts-expect-error - Apple is a Fruit, but not vice versa
13expectTypeOf<Fruit>().toExtend<Apple>()

Assertions can be inverted with .not:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).not.toExtend<{b: 1}>()
2expectTypeOf({a: 1}).not.toMatchObjectType<{b: 1}>()

.not can be easier than relying on // @ts-expect-error:

1type Fruit = {type: 'Fruit'; edible: boolean}
2type Apple = {type: 'Fruit'; name: 'Apple'; edible: true}
3
4expectTypeOf<Apple>().toExtend<Fruit>()
5
6expectTypeOf<Fruit>().not.toExtend<Apple>()
7expectTypeOf<Apple>().not.toEqualTypeOf<Fruit>()

Catch any/unknown/never types:

1expectTypeOf<unknown>().toBeUnknown()
2expectTypeOf<any>().toBeAny()
3expectTypeOf<never>().toBeNever()
4
5// @ts-expect-error
6expectTypeOf<never>().toBeNumber()

.toEqualTypeOf distinguishes between deeply-nested any and unknown properties:

1expectTypeOf<{deeply: {nested: any}}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{deeply: {nested: unknown}}>()

You can test for basic JavaScript types:

1expectTypeOf(() => 1).toBeFunction()
2expectTypeOf({}).toBeObject()
3expectTypeOf([]).toBeArray()
4expectTypeOf('').toBeString()
5expectTypeOf(1).toBeNumber()
6expectTypeOf(true).toBeBoolean()
7expectTypeOf(() => {}).returns.toBeVoid()
8expectTypeOf(Promise.resolve(123)).resolves.toBeNumber()
9expectTypeOf(Symbol(1)).toBeSymbol()
10expectTypeOf(1n).toBeBigInt()

.toBe... methods allow for types that extend the expected type:

1expectTypeOf<number>().toBeNumber()
2expectTypeOf<1>().toBeNumber()
3
4expectTypeOf<any[]>().toBeArray()
5expectTypeOf<number[]>().toBeArray()
6
7expectTypeOf<string>().toBeString()
8expectTypeOf<'foo'>().toBeString()
9
10expectTypeOf<boolean>().toBeBoolean()
11expectTypeOf<true>().toBeBoolean()
12
13expectTypeOf<bigint>().toBeBigInt()
14expectTypeOf<0n>().toBeBigInt()

.toBe... methods protect against any:

1const goodIntParser = (s: string) => Number.parseInt(s, 10)
2const badIntParser = (s: string) => JSON.parse(s) // uh-oh - works at runtime if the input is a number, but return 'any'
3
4expectTypeOf(goodIntParser).returns.toBeNumber()
5// @ts-expect-error - if you write a test like this, `.toBeNumber()` will let you know your implementation returns `any`.
6expectTypeOf(badIntParser).returns.toBeNumber()

Nullable types:

1expectTypeOf(undefined).toBeUndefined()
2expectTypeOf(undefined).toBeNullable()
3expectTypeOf(undefined).not.toBeNull()
4
5expectTypeOf(null).toBeNull()
6expectTypeOf(null).toBeNullable()
7expectTypeOf(null).not.toBeUndefined()
8
9expectTypeOf<1 | undefined>().toBeNullable()
10expectTypeOf<1 | null>().toBeNullable()
11expectTypeOf<1 | undefined | null>().toBeNullable()

More .not examples:

1expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeUnknown()
2expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeAny()
3expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeNever()
4expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeNull()
5expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeUndefined()
6expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeNullable()
7expectTypeOf(1).not.toBeBigInt()

Detect assignability of unioned types:

1expectTypeOf<number>().toExtend<string | number>()
2expectTypeOf<string | number>().not.toExtend<number>()

Use .extract and .exclude to narrow down complex union types:

1type ResponsiveProp<T> = T | T[] | {xs?: T; sm?: T; md?: T}
2const getResponsiveProp = <T>(_props: T): ResponsiveProp<T> => ({})
3type CSSProperties = {margin?: string; padding?: string}
4
5const cssProperties: CSSProperties = {margin: '1px', padding: '2px'}
6
7expectTypeOf(getResponsiveProp(cssProperties))
8  .exclude<unknown[]>()
9  .exclude<{xs?: unknown}>()
10  .toEqualTypeOf<CSSProperties>()
11
12expectTypeOf(getResponsiveProp(cssProperties))
13  .extract<unknown[]>()
14  .toEqualTypeOf<CSSProperties[]>()
15
16expectTypeOf(getResponsiveProp(cssProperties))
17  .extract<{xs?: any}>()
18  .toEqualTypeOf<{xs?: CSSProperties; sm?: CSSProperties; md?: CSSProperties}>()
19
20expectTypeOf<ResponsiveProp<number>>().exclude<number | number[]>().toHaveProperty('sm')
21expectTypeOf<ResponsiveProp<number>>().exclude<number | number[]>().not.toHaveProperty('xxl')

.extract and .exclude return never if no types remain after exclusion:

1type Person = {name: string; age: number}
2type Customer = Person & {customerId: string}
3type Employee = Person & {employeeId: string}
4
5expectTypeOf<Customer | Employee>().extract<{foo: string}>().toBeNever()
6expectTypeOf<Customer | Employee>().exclude<{name: string}>().toBeNever()

Use .pick to pick a set of properties from an object:

1type Person = {name: string; age: number}
2
3expectTypeOf<Person>().pick<'name'>().toEqualTypeOf<{name: string}>()

Use .omit to remove a set of properties from an object:

1type Person = {name: string; age: number}
2
3expectTypeOf<Person>().omit<'name'>().toEqualTypeOf<{age: number}>()

Make assertions about object properties:

1const obj = {a: 1, b: ''}
2
3// check that properties exist (or don't) with `.toHaveProperty`
4expectTypeOf(obj).toHaveProperty('a')
5expectTypeOf(obj).not.toHaveProperty('c')
6
7// check types of properties
8expectTypeOf(obj).toHaveProperty('a').toBeNumber()
9expectTypeOf(obj).toHaveProperty('b').toBeString()
10expectTypeOf(obj).toHaveProperty('a').not.toBeString()

.toEqualTypeOf can be used to distinguish between functions:

1type NoParam = () => void
2type HasParam = (s: string) => void
3
4expectTypeOf<NoParam>().not.toEqualTypeOf<HasParam>()

But often it's preferable to use .parameters or .returns for more specific function assertions:

1type NoParam = () => void
2type HasParam = (s: string) => void
3
4expectTypeOf<NoParam>().parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[]>()
5expectTypeOf<NoParam>().returns.toBeVoid()
6
7expectTypeOf<HasParam>().parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[string]>()
8expectTypeOf<HasParam>().returns.toBeVoid()

Up to ten overloads will produce union types for .parameters and .returns:

1type Factorize = {
2  (input: number): number[]
3  (input: bigint): bigint[]
4}
5
6expectTypeOf<Factorize>().parameters.not.toEqualTypeOf<[number]>()
7expectTypeOf<Factorize>().parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[number] | [bigint]>()
8expectTypeOf<Factorize>().returns.toEqualTypeOf<number[] | bigint[]>()
9
10expectTypeOf<Factorize>().parameter(0).toEqualTypeOf<number | bigint>()

Note that these aren't exactly like TypeScript's built-in Parameters<...> and ReturnType<...>:

The TypeScript builtins simply choose a single overload (see the Overloaded functions section for more information)

1type Factorize = {
2  (input: number): number[]
3  (input: bigint): bigint[]
4}
5
6// overload using `number` is ignored!
7expectTypeOf<Parameters<Factorize>>().toEqualTypeOf<[bigint]>()
8expectTypeOf<ReturnType<Factorize>>().toEqualTypeOf<bigint[]>()

More examples of ways to work with functions - parameters using .parameter(n) or .parameters, and return values using .returns:

1const f = (a: number) => [a, a]
2
3expectTypeOf(f).toBeFunction()
4
5expectTypeOf(f).toBeCallableWith(1)
6expectTypeOf(f).not.toBeAny()
7expectTypeOf(f).returns.not.toBeAny()
8expectTypeOf(f).returns.toEqualTypeOf([1, 2])
9expectTypeOf(f).returns.toEqualTypeOf([1, 2, 3])
10expectTypeOf(f).parameter(0).not.toEqualTypeOf('1')
11expectTypeOf(f).parameter(0).toEqualTypeOf(1)
12expectTypeOf(1).parameter(0).toBeNever()
13
14const twoArgFunc = (a: number, b: string) => ({a, b})
15
16expectTypeOf(twoArgFunc).parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[number, string]>()

.toBeCallableWith allows for overloads. You can also use it to narrow down the return type for given input parameters.:

1type Factorize = {
2  (input: number): number[]
3  (input: bigint): bigint[]
4}
5
6expectTypeOf<Factorize>().toBeCallableWith(6)
7expectTypeOf<Factorize>().toBeCallableWith(6n)

.toBeCallableWith returns a type that can be used to narrow down the return type for given input parameters.:

1type Factorize = {
2  (input: number): number[]
3  (input: bigint): bigint[]
4}
5expectTypeOf<Factorize>().toBeCallableWith(6).returns.toEqualTypeOf<number[]>()
6expectTypeOf<Factorize>().toBeCallableWith(6n).returns.toEqualTypeOf<bigint[]>()

.toBeCallableWith can be used to narrow down the parameters of a function:

1type Delete = {
2  (path: string): void
3  (paths: string[], options?: {force: boolean}): void
4}
5
6expectTypeOf<Delete>().toBeCallableWith('abc').parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[string]>()
7expectTypeOf<Delete>()
8  .toBeCallableWith(['abc', 'def'], {force: true})
9  .parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[string[], {force: boolean}?]>()
10
11expectTypeOf<Delete>().toBeCallableWith('abc').parameter(0).toBeString()
12expectTypeOf<Delete>().toBeCallableWith('abc').parameter(1).toBeUndefined()
13
14expectTypeOf<Delete>()
15  .toBeCallableWith(['abc', 'def', 'ghi'])
16  .parameter(0)
17  .toEqualTypeOf<string[]>()
18
19expectTypeOf<Delete>()
20  .toBeCallableWith(['abc', 'def', 'ghi'])
21  .parameter(1)
22  .toEqualTypeOf<{force: boolean} | undefined>()

You can't use .toBeCallableWith with .not - you need to use ts-expect-error::

1const f = (a: number) => [a, a]
2
3// @ts-expect-error
4expectTypeOf(f).toBeCallableWith('foo')

Use .map to transform types:

This can be useful for generic functions or complex types which you can't access via .toBeCallableWith, .toHaveProperty etc. The callback function isn't called at runtime, which can make this a useful way to get complex inferred types without worrying about running code.

1const capitalize = <S extends string>(input: S) =>
2  (input.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + input.slice(1)) as Capitalize<S>
3
4expectTypeOf(capitalize)
5  .map(fn => fn('hello world'))
6  .toEqualTypeOf<'Hello world'>()

You can also check type guards & type assertions:

1const assertNumber = (v: any): asserts v is number => {
2  if (typeof v !== 'number') {
3    throw new TypeError('Nope !')
4  }
5}
6
7expectTypeOf(assertNumber).asserts.toBeNumber()
8
9const isString = (v: any): v is string => typeof v === 'string'
10
11expectTypeOf(isString).guards.toBeString()
12
13const isBigInt = (value: any): value is bigint => typeof value === 'bigint'
14
15expectTypeOf(isBigInt).guards.toBeBigInt()

Assert on constructor parameters:

1expectTypeOf(Date).toBeConstructibleWith('1970')
2expectTypeOf(Date).toBeConstructibleWith(0)
3expectTypeOf(Date).toBeConstructibleWith(new Date())
4expectTypeOf(Date).toBeConstructibleWith()
5
6expectTypeOf(Date).constructorParameters.toEqualTypeOf<
7  | []
8  | [value: string | number]
9  | [value: string | number | Date]
10  | [
11      year: number,
12      monthIndex: number,
13      date?: number | undefined,
14      hours?: number | undefined,
15      minutes?: number | undefined,
16      seconds?: number | undefined,
17      ms?: number | undefined,
18    ]
19>()

Constructor overloads:

1class DBConnection {
2  constructor()
3  constructor(connectionString: string)
4  constructor(options: {host: string; port: number})
5  constructor(..._: unknown[]) {}
6}
7
8expectTypeOf(DBConnection).toBeConstructibleWith()
9expectTypeOf(DBConnection).toBeConstructibleWith('localhost')
10expectTypeOf(DBConnection).toBeConstructibleWith({host: 'localhost', port: 1234})
11// @ts-expect-error - as when calling `new DBConnection(...)` you can't actually use the `(...args: unknown[])` overlaod, it's purely for the implementation.
12expectTypeOf(DBConnection).toBeConstructibleWith(1, 2)

Check function this parameters:

1function greet(this: {name: string}, message: string) {
2  return `Hello ${this.name}, here's your message: ${message}`
3}
4
5expectTypeOf(greet).thisParameter.toEqualTypeOf<{name: string}>()

Distinguish between functions with different this parameters:

1function greetFormal(this: {title: string; name: string}, message: string) {
2  return `Dear ${this.title} ${this.name}, here's your message: ${message}`
3}
4
5function greetCasual(this: {name: string}, message: string) {
6  return `Hi ${this.name}, here's your message: ${message}`
7}
8
9expectTypeOf(greetFormal).not.toEqualTypeOf(greetCasual)

Class instance types:

1expectTypeOf(Date).instance.toHaveProperty('toISOString')

Promise resolution types can be checked with .resolves:

1const asyncFunc = async () => 123
2
3expectTypeOf(asyncFunc).returns.resolves.toBeNumber()

Array items can be checked with .items:

1expectTypeOf([1, 2, 3]).items.toBeNumber()
2expectTypeOf([1, 2, 3]).items.not.toBeString()

You can also compare arrays directly:

1expectTypeOf<any[]>().not.toEqualTypeOf<number[]>()

Check that functions never return:

1const thrower = () => {
2  throw new Error('oh no')
3}
4
5expectTypeOf(thrower).returns.toBeNever()

Generics can be used rather than references:

1expectTypeOf<{a: string}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: number}>()

Distinguish between missing/null/optional properties:

1expectTypeOf<{a?: number}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{}>()
2expectTypeOf<{a?: number}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: number}>()
3expectTypeOf<{a?: number}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: number | undefined}>()
4expectTypeOf<{a?: number | null}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: number | null}>()
5expectTypeOf<{a: {b?: number}}>().not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {}}>()

Detect the difference between regular and readonly properties:

1type A1 = {readonly a: string; b: string}
2type E1 = {a: string; b: string}
3
4expectTypeOf<A1>().toExtend<E1>()
5expectTypeOf<A1>().not.toEqualTypeOf<E1>()
6
7type A2 = {a: string; b: {readonly c: string}}
8type E2 = {a: string; b: {c: string}}
9
10expectTypeOf<A2>().toExtend<E2>()
11expectTypeOf<A2>().not.toEqualTypeOf<E2>()

Distinguish between classes with different constructors:

1class A {
2  value: number
3  constructor(a: 1) {
4    this.value = a
5  }
6}
7class B {
8  value: number
9  constructor(b: 2) {
10    this.value = b
11  }
12}
13
14expectTypeOf<typeof A>().not.toEqualTypeOf<typeof B>()
15
16class C {
17  value: number
18  constructor(c: 1) {
19    this.value = c
20  }
21}
22
23expectTypeOf<typeof A>().toEqualTypeOf<typeof C>()

Known limitation: Intersection types can cause issues with toEqualTypeOf:

1// @ts-expect-error the following line doesn't compile, even though the types are arguably the same.
2// See https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/21
3expectTypeOf<{a: 1} & {b: 2}>().toEqualTypeOf<{a: 1; b: 2}>()

To workaround for simple cases, you can use a mapped type:

1type Simplify<T> = {[K in keyof T]: T[K]}
2
3expectTypeOf<Simplify<{a: 1} & {b: 2}>>().toEqualTypeOf<{a: 1; b: 2}>()

But this won't work if the nesting is deeper in the type. For these situations, you can use the .branded helper. Note that this comes at a performance cost, and can cause the compiler to 'give up' if used with excessively deep types, so use sparingly. This helper is under .branded because it deeply transforms the Actual and Expected types into a pseudo-AST:

1// @ts-expect-error
2expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: 1}}>()
3
4expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().branded.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: 1}}>()

Be careful with .branded for very deep or complex types, though. If possible you should find a way to simplify your test to avoid needing to use it:

1// This *should* result in an error, but the "branding" mechanism produces too large a type and TypeScript just gives up! https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/50670
2expectTypeOf<() => () => () => () => 1>().branded.toEqualTypeOf<() => () => () => () => 2>()
3
4// @ts-expect-error the non-branded implementation catches the error as expected.
5expectTypeOf<() => () => () => () => 1>().toEqualTypeOf<() => () => () => () => 2>()

So, if you have an extremely deep type that ALSO has an intersection in it, you're out of luck and this library won't be able to test your type properly:

1// @ts-expect-error this fails, but it should succeed.
2expectTypeOf<() => () => () => () => {a: 1} & {b: 2}>().toEqualTypeOf<
3  () => () => () => () => {a: 1; b: 2}
4>()
5
6// this succeeds, but it should fail.
7expectTypeOf<() => () => () => () => {a: 1} & {b: 2}>().branded.toEqualTypeOf<
8  () => () => () => () => {a: 1; c: 2}
9>()

Another limitation: passing this references to expectTypeOf results in errors.:

1class B {
2  b = 'b'
3
4  foo() {
5    // @ts-expect-error
6    expectTypeOf(this).toEqualTypeOf(this)
7  }
8}
9
10// Instead of the above, try something like this:
11expectTypeOf(B).instance.toEqualTypeOf<{b: string; foo: () => void}>()

Overloads limitation for TypeScript <5.3: Due to a TypeScript bug fixed in 5.3, overloaded functions which include an overload resembling (...args: unknown[]) => unknown will exclude unknown[] from .parameters and exclude unknown from .returns:

1type Factorize = {
2  (...args: unknown[]): unknown
3  (input: number): number[]
4  (input: bigint): bigint[]
5}
6
7expectTypeOf<Factorize>().parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[number] | [bigint]>()
8expectTypeOf<Factorize>().returns.toEqualTypeOf<number[] | bigint[]>()

This overload, however, allows any input and returns an unknown output anyway, so it's not very useful. If you are worried about this for some reason, you'll have to update TypeScript to 5.3+.

Why is my assertion failing?

For complex types, an assertion might fail when it should if the Actual type contains a deeply-nested intersection type but the Expected doesn't. In these cases you can use .branded as described above:

1// @ts-expect-error this unfortunately fails - a TypeScript limitation prevents making this pass without a big perf hit
2expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: 1}}>()
3
4expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().branded.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: 1}}>()

Where is .toMatchTypeOf?

The .toMatchTypeOf method is deprecated, in favour of .toMatchObjectType (when strictly checking against an object type with a subset of keys), or .toExtend (when checking for "is-a" relationships). There are no foreseeable plans to remove .toMatchTypeOf, but there's no reason to continue using it - .toMatchObjectType is stricter, and .toExtend is identical.

Internal type helpers

🚧 This library also exports some helper types for performing boolean operations on types, checking extension/equality in various ways, branding types, and checking for various special types like never, any, unknown. Use at your own risk! Nothing is stopping you from using these beyond this warning:

All internal types that are not documented here are not part of the supported API surface, and may be renamed, modified, or removed, without warning or documentation in release notes.

For a dedicated internal type library, feel free to look at the source code for inspiration - or better, use a library like type-fest.

Error messages

When types don't match, .toEqualTypeOf and .toMatchTypeOf use a special helper type to produce error messages that are as actionable as possible. But there's a bit of a nuance to understanding them. Since the assertions are written "fluently", the failure should be on the "expected" type, not the "actual" type (expect<Actual>().toEqualTypeOf<Expected>()). This means that type errors can be a little confusing - so this library produces a MismatchInfo type to try to make explicit what the expectation is. For example:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>()

Is an assertion that will fail, since {a: 1} has type {a: number} and not {a: string}. The error message in this case will read something like this:

test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '{ a: string; }' does not satisfy the constraint '{ a: \\"Expected: string, Actual: number\\"; }'.
  Types of property 'a' are incompatible.
    Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: string, Actual: number\\"'.

999 expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>()

Note that the type constraint reported is a human-readable messaging specifying both the "expected" and "actual" types. Rather than taking the sentence Types of property 'a' are incompatible // Type 'string' is not assignable to type "Expected: string, Actual: number" literally - just look at the property name ('a') and the message: Expected: string, Actual: number. This will tell you what's wrong, in most cases. Extremely complex types will, of course, be more effort to debug, and may require some experimentation. Please raise an issue if the error messages are misleading.

The toBe... methods (like toBeString, toBeNumber, toBeVoid, etc.) fail by resolving to a non-callable type when the Actual type under test doesn't match up. For example, the failure for an assertion like expectTypeOf(1).toBeString() will look something like this:

test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2349: This expression is not callable.
  Type 'ExpectString<number>' has no call signatures.

999 expectTypeOf(1).toBeString()
                    ~~~~~~~~~~

The This expression is not callable part isn't all that helpful - the meaningful error is the next line, Type 'ExpectString<number> has no call signatures. This essentially means you passed a number but asserted it should be a string.

If TypeScript added support for "throw" types these error messages could be improved. Until then they will take a certain amount of squinting.

Concrete "expected" objects vs type arguments

Error messages for an assertion like this:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf({a: ''})

Will be less helpful than for an assertion like this:

1expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>()

This is because the TypeScript compiler needs to infer the type argument for the .toEqualTypeOf({a: ''}) style and this library can only mark it as a failure by comparing it against a generic Mismatch type. So, where possible, use a type argument rather than a concrete type for .toEqualTypeOf and toMatchTypeOf. If it's much more convenient to compare two concrete types, you can use typeof:

1const one = valueFromFunctionOne({some: {complex: inputs}})
2const two = valueFromFunctionTwo({some: {other: inputs}})
3
4expectTypeOf(one).toEqualTypeof<typeof two>()

Overloaded functions

Due to a TypeScript design limitation, the native TypeScript Parameters<...> and ReturnType<...> helpers only return types from one variant of an overloaded function. This limitation doesn't apply to expect-type, since it is not used to author TypeScript code, only to assert on existing types. So, we use a workaround for this TypeScript behaviour to assert on all overloads as a union (actually, not necessarily all - we cap out at 10 overloads).

Within test frameworks

Vitest

expectTypeOf is built in to vitest, so you can import expectTypeOf from the vitest library directly if you prefer. Note that there is no set release cadence, at time of writing, so vitest may not always be using the very latest version.

1import {expectTypeOf} from 'vitest'
2import {mount} from './mount.js'
3
4test('my types work properly', () => {
5  expectTypeOf(mount).toBeFunction()
6  expectTypeOf(mount).parameter(0).toMatchTypeOf<{name: string}>()
7
8  expectTypeOf(mount({name: 42})).toBeString()
9})

Jest & eslint-plugin-jest

If you're using Jest along with eslint-plugin-jest, and you put assertions inside test(...) definitions, you may get warnings from the jest/expect-expect rule, complaining that "Test has no assertions" for tests that only use expectTypeOf().

To remove this warning, configure the ESLint rule to consider expectTypeOf as an assertion:

1"rules": {
2  // ...
3  "jest/expect-expect": [
4    "warn",
5    {
6      "assertFunctionNames": [
7        "expect", "expectTypeOf"
8      ]
9    }
10  ],
11  // ...
12}

Limitations

A summary of some of the limitations of this library. Some of these are documented more fully elsewhere.

1. Intersection types can result in failures when the expected and actual types are not identically defined, even when they are effectively identical. See Why is my assertion failing for details. TL;DR: use .brand in these cases - and accept the performance hit that it comes with.
2. toBeCallableWith will likely fail if you try to use it with a generic function or an overload. See this issue for an example and how to work around it.
3. (For now) overloaded functions might trip up the .parameter and .parameters helpers. This matches how the built-in TypeScript helper Parameters<...> works. This may be improved in the future though (see related issue).
4. expectTypeOf(this).toEqualTypeOf(this) inside class methods does not work.

Similar projects

Other projects with similar goals:

• tsd is a CLI that runs the TypeScript type checker over assertions
• ts-expect exports several generic helper types to perform type assertions
• dtslint does type checks via comment directives and tslint
• type-plus comes with various type and runtime TypeScript assertions
• static-type-assert type assertion functions

Comparison

The key differences in this project are:

• a fluent, jest-inspired API, making the difference between actual and expected clear. This is helpful with complex types and assertions.
• inverting assertions intuitively and easily via expectTypeOf(...).not
• checks generics properly and strictly (tsd doesn't)
• first-class support for:
  • any (as well as unknown and never) (see issues outstanding at time of writing in tsd for never and any).
    • This can be especially useful in combination with not, to protect against functions returning too-permissive types. For example, const parseFile = (filename: string) => JSON.parse(readFileSync(filename).toString()) returns any, which could lead to errors. After giving it a proper return-type, you can add a test for this with expect(parseFile).returns.not.toBeAny()
  • object properties
  • function parameters
  • function return values
  • constructor parameters
  • class instances
  • array item values
  • nullable types
• assertions on types "matching" rather than exact type equality, for "is-a" relationships e.g. expectTypeOf(square).toMatchTypeOf<Shape>()
• built into existing tooling. No extra build step, cli tool, IDE extension, or lint plugin is needed. Just import the function and start writing tests. Failures will be at compile time - they'll appear in your IDE and when you run tsc.
• small implementation with no dependencies. Take a look! (tsd, for comparison, is 2.6MB because it ships a patched version of TypeScript).

TypeScript backwards-compatibility

There is a CI job called test-types that checks whether the tests still pass with certain older TypeScript versions. To check the supported TypeScript versions, refer to the job definition.

Contributing

In most cases, it's worth checking existing issues or creating one to discuss a new feature or a bug fix before opening a pull request.

Once you're ready to make a pull request: clone the repo, and install pnpm if you don't have it already with npm install --global pnpm. Lockfiles for npm and yarn are gitignored.

If you're adding a feature, you should write a self-contained usage example in the form of a test, in test/usage.test.ts. This file is used to populate the bulk of this readme using eslint-plugin-codegen, and to generate an "errors" test file, which captures the error messages that are emitted for failing assertions by the TypeScript compiler. So, the test name should be written as a human-readable sentence explaining the usage example. Have a look at the existing tests for an idea of the style.

After adding the tests, run npm run lint -- --fix to update the readme, and npm test -- --updateSnapshot to update the errors test. The generated documentation and tests should be pushed to the same branch as the source code, and submitted as a pull request. CI will test that the docs and tests are up to date if you forget to run these commands.

Documentation of limitations through tests

Limitations of the library are documented through tests in usage.test.ts. This means that if a future TypeScript version (or library version) fixes the limitation, the test will start failing, and it will be automatically removed from the documentation once it no longer applies.