Gathering detailed insights and metrics for secure-filters
Gathering detailed insights and metrics for secure-filters
Gathering detailed insights and metrics for secure-filters
Gathering detailed insights and metrics for secure-filters
npm install secure-filters
Module System
Min. Node Version
Typescript Support
Node Version
NPM Version
139 Stars
117 Commits
39 Forks
36 Watching
11 Branches
36 Contributors
Updated on 17 Mar 2024
JavaScript (91.9%)
HTML (8.1%)
Cumulative downloads
Total Downloads
Last day
-33.5%
105
Compared to previous day
Last week
-9.5%
476
Compared to previous week
Last month
11.8%
2,224
Compared to previous month
Last year
-31.8%
29,040
Compared to previous year
4
secure-filters
is a collection of Output Sanitization functions ("filters")
to provide protection against Cross-Site Scripting
(XSS) and other
injection attacks.
npm install --save secure-filters
html(value)
- Sanitizes HTML contexts using entity-encoding.js(value)
- Sanitizes JavaScript string contexts using backslash-encoding.jsObj(value)
- Sanitizes JavaScript literals (numbers, strings,
booleans, arrays, and objects) for inclusion in an HTML script context.json(value)
- Sanitized already-serialized JSON strings for HTML script contexts.jsAttr(value)
- Sanitizes JavaScript string contexts in an HTML attribute
using a combination of entity- and backslash-encoding.uri(value)
- Sanitizes URI contexts using percent-encoding.css(value)
- Sanitizes CSS contexts using backslash-encoding.style(value)
- Sanitizes CSS contexts in an HTML style
attributeXSS is the #3 most critical security flaw affecting web applications for 2013, as determined by a broad consensus among OWASP members.
To effectively combat XSS, you must combine Input Validation with Output Sanitization. Using one or the other is not sufficient; you must apply both! Also, simple validations like string length aren't as effective; it's much safer to use whitelist-based validation.
The generally accepted flow in preventing XSS looks like this:
Whichever Input Validation and Output Sanitization modules you end up using, please review the code carefully and apply your own professional paranoia. Trust, but verify.
secure-filters
doesn't deal with Input Validation, only Ouput Sanitization.
You can roll your own input validation or you can use an existing module. Either way, there are many important rules to follow.
This Stack-Overflow thread lists several input validation options specific to node.js.
One of those options is node-validator (NPM, github). It provides an impressive list of chainable validators. Validator also has a 3rd party express-validate middleware module for use in the popular Express node.js server.
Input Validation can be specialized to the data format. For example, the jsonschema module (NPM, github) can be useful for providing strict validation of JSON documents (e.g. bodies in HTTP).
Output Sanitization (also known as Ouput Filtering) is what secure-filters
is
responsible for.
In order to properly santize output you need to be sensitive to the context in which the data is being output. For example, if you want to place text in an HTML document, you should HTML-escape the text.
But what about CSS or JavaScript contexts? You can't use the HTML-escape filter; a different escaping method is necessary. If the filter doesn't match the context, it's possible for browsers to misinterpret the result, which can lead to XSS attacks!
secure-filters
aims to provide the filter functions necessary to do this type
of context-sensitive sanitization.
"Sanitization" is an overloaded term and can be confused with other security techniques.
For example, if you need to store and sanitize HTML, you'd want to parse,
validate and sanitize that HTML in one hybridized step. There are tools like
Google Caja to do HTML sanitization.
The sanitizer
module
packages-up Caja for node.js/CommonJS usage.
secure-filters
can be used with EJS or as normal functions.
1 npm install --save secure-filters
:warning: CAUTION: If the Content-Type
HTTP header for your document, or
the <meta charset="">
tag (or eqivalent) specifies a non-UTF-8 encoding these
filters may not provide adequate protection! Some browsers can treat some
characters at Unicode code-points 0x00A0
and above as if they were <
if the
encoding is not set to UTF-8!
To configure EJS, simply wrap your require('ejs')
call. This will import the
filters using the names pre-defined by this module.
1 var ejs = require('secure-filters').configure(require('ejs'));
Then, within an EJS template:
1 <script> 2 var config = <%-: config |jsObj%>; 3 var userId = parseInt('<%-: userId |js%>',10); 4 </script> 5 <a href="/welcome/<%-: userId |uri%>">Welcome <%-: userName |html%></a> 6 <br> 7 <a href="javascript:activate('<%-: userId |jsAttr%>')">Click here to activate</a>
There's a handy cheat sheet showing all the filters in EJS syntax.
Rather than importing the pre-defined names we've chosen, here are some other
ways to integrate secure-filters
with EJS.
As of EJS 0.8.4, you can replace the escape()
function during template
compilation. This allows <%= %>
to be safer than the
default.
1var escapeHTML = secureFilters.html; 2var templateFn = ejs.compile(template, { escape: escapeHTML });
It's possible that the filter names pre-defined by this module interferes with
existing filters that you've written. Or, you may wish to import a sub-set of
the filters. In which case, you can simply assign properties to the
ejs.filters
object.
1 var secureFilters = require('secure-filters'); 2 var ejs = require('ejs'); 3 ejs.filters.secJS = secureFilters.js;
1 <script> 2 var myStr = "<%-: myVal | secJS %>"; 3 </script>
Or, you can namespace using a parametric style, similar to how EJS' pre-defined
get:'prop'
filter works:
1 var secureFilters = require('secure-filters'); 2 var ejs = require('ejs'); 3 ejs.filters.sec = function(val, context) { 4 return secureFilters[context](val); 5 };
1 <script> 2 var myStr = "<%-: myVal | sec:'js' %>"; 3 </script>
The filter functions are just regular functions and can be used outside of EJS.
1 var htmlEscape = require('secure-filters').html; 2 var escaped = htmlEscape('"><script>alert(\'pwn\')</script>'); 3 assert.equal(escaped, 4 '"><script>alert('pwn')</script>');
You can simply include the lib/secure-filters.js
file itself to get started.
1 <script type="text/javascript" src="path/to/secure-filters.js"></script> 2 <script type="text/javascript"> 3 var escaped = secureFilters.html(userInput); 4 //... 5 </script>
We've also added AMD module
definition to secure-filters.js
for use in Require.js and other AMD frameworks. We
don't pre-define a name, but suggest that you use 'secure-filters'.
By convention in the Contexts below, USERINPUT
should be replaced with the
output of the filter function.
Sanitizes output for HTML element and attribute contexts using entity-encoding.
Contexts:
1 <p>Hello, <span id="name">USERINPUT</span></p> 2 <div class="USERINPUT"></div> 3 <div class='USERINPUT'></div>
:warning: CAUTION: this is not the correct encoding for embedding the contents of
a <script>
or <style>
block (plus other blocks that cannot have
entity-encoded characters).
Any character not matched by /[\t\n\v\f\r ,\.0-9A-Z_a-z\-\u00A0-\uFFFF]/
is
replaced with an HTML entity. Additionally, characters matched by
/[\x00-\x08\x0B\x0C\x0E-\x1F\x7F-\x9F]/
are converted to spaces to avoid
browser quirks that interpret these as non-characters.
<%= %>
You might be asking "Why provide html(var)
? EJS already does HTML escaping!".
Prior to 0.8.5,
EJS doesn't escape the '
(apostrophe) character when using the <%= %>
syntax. This can lead to XSS accidents! Consider the template:
1 <img src='<%= prefs.avatar %>'>
When given user input x' onerror='alert(1)
, the above gets rendered as:
1 <img src='x' onerror='alert(1)'>
Which will cause the onerror
javascript to run. Using this module's filter
should prevent this.
1 <img src='<%-: prefs.avatar |html%>'>
When given user input x' onerror='alert(1)
, the above gets rendered as:
1 <img src='x' onerror='alert(1)'>
Which will not run the attacking script.
Sanitizes output for JavaScript string contexts using backslash-encoding.
1 <script> 2 var singleQuote = 'USERINPUT'; 3 var doubleQuote = "USERINPUT"; 4 var anInt = parseInt('USERINPUT', 10); 5 var aFloat = parseFloat('USERINPUT'); 6 var aBool = ('USERINPUT' === 'true'); 7 </script>
:warning: CAUTION: you need to always put quotes around the embedded value; don't assume that it's a bare int/float/boolean constant!
:warning: CAUTION: this is not the correct encoding for the entire contents of a
<script>
block! You need to sanitize each variable in-turn.
Any character not matched by /[,\-\.0-9A-Z_a-z]/
is escaped as \xHH
or
\uHHHH
where H
is a hexidecimal digit. The shorter \x
form is used for
charaters in the 7-bit ASCII range (i.e. code point <= 0x7F).
Sanitizes output for a JSON string in an HTML script context.
1 <script> 2 var config = USERINPUT; 3 </script>
This function escapes certain characters within a JSON string. Any character
not matched by /[",\-\.0-9:A-Z\[\\\]_a-z{}]/
is escaped consistent with the
js(value)
escaping above. Additionally, the sub-string ]]>
is
encoded as \x5D\x5D\x3E
to prevent breaking out of CDATA context.
Because <
and >
are not matched characters, they get encoded as \x3C
and
\x3E
, respectively. This prevents breaking out of a surrounding HTML
<script>
context.
For example, with a JSON string like '{"username":"Albert </script><script>alert(\"Pwnerton\")"}'
,
json()
gives output:
1 <script> 2 var config = {"username":"\x3C\x2Fscript\x3E\x3Cscript\x3Ealert\x28\"Pwnerton\"\x29"}; 3 </script>
Sanitizes output for a JavaScript literal in an HTML script context.
1 <script> 2 var config = USERINPUT; 3 </script>
This function encodes the object with JSON.stringify()
, then
escapes using json(value)
detailed above.
For example, with a literal object like {username:'Albert </script><script>alert("Pwnerton")'}
, jsObj()
gives output:
1 <script> 2 var config = {"username":"\x3C\x2Fscript\x3E\x3Cscript\x3Ealert\x28\"Pwnerton\"\x29"}; 3 </script>
Article: JSON isn't a JavaScript Subset.
JSON is almost a subset of JavaScript, but for two characters: LINE SEPARATOR
U+2028
and PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR
U+2029. These
two characters can't legally appear in JavaScript strings and must be escaped.
Due to the ambiguity of these and other Unicode whitespace characters,
secure-filters
will backslash encode U+2028 as \u2028
, U+2029 as \u2029
,
etc.
Sanitizes output for embedded HTML scripting attributes using a special combination of backslash- and entity-encoding.
1 <a href="javascript:doActivate('USERINPUT')">click to activate</a> 2 <button onclick="display('USERINPUT')">Click To Display</button>
The string <ha>, 'ha', "ha"
is escaped to <ha>, \'ha\', \"ha\"
. Note the backslashes before the apostrophe and quote
entities.
Sanitizes output in URI component contexts by using percent-encoding.
1 <a href="http://example.com/?this=USERINPUT&that=USERINPUT"> 2 <a href="http://example.com/api/v2/user/USERINPUT">
The ranges 0-9, A-Z, a-z, plus hypen, dot and underscore (-._
) are
preserved. Every other character is converted to UTF-8, then output as %XX
percent-encoded octets, where X is an uppercase hexidecimal digit.
Note that if composing a URL, the entire result should ideally be HTML-escaped before insertion into HTML. However, since Percent-encoding is also HTML-safe, it may be sufficient to just URI-encode the untrusted components if you know the rest is application-supplied.
Sanitizes output in CSS contexts by using backslash encoding.
1 <style type="text/css"> 2 #user-USERINPUT { 3 background-color: #USERINPUT; 4 } 5 </style>
:warning: CAUTION this is not the correct filter for a style=""
attribute; use
the style(value)
filter instead!
:warning: CAUTION even though this module prevents breaking out of CSS
context, it is still somewhat risky to allow user-controlled input into CSS and
<style>
blocks. Be sure to combine CSS escaping with whitelist-based input
sanitization! Here's a small sampling of what's possible:
The ranges a-z, A-Z, 0-9 plus Unicode U+10000 and higher are preserved. All
other characters are encoded as \h
, where h
is one one or more lowercase
hexadecimal digits, including the trailing space.
Confusingly, CSS allows NO-BREAK SPACE
U+00A0 to be used in an identifier.
Because of this confusion, it's possible browsers treat it as whitespace, and
so secure-filters
escapes it.
Since the behaviour of NUL in CSS2.1 is
undefined, it is replaced
with \fffd
, REPLACEMENT CHARACTER
U+FFFD.
For example, the string <wow>
becomes \3c wow\3e
(note the trailing space).
Encodes values for safe embedding in HTML style attribute context.
USAGE: all instances of USERINPUT
should be sanitized by this function
1 <div style="background-color: #USERINPUT;"></div>
:warning: CAUTION even though this module prevents breaking out of style-attribute context, it is still somewhat risky to allow user-controlled input (see caveats on css above). Be sure to combine with whitelist-based input sanitization!
Encodes the value first as in the css()
filter, then HTML entity-encodes the result.
For example, the string <wow>
becomes \3c wow\3e
.
Please see the Contribution Guide.
Support is provided via github issues.
For responsible disclosures, email Salesforce Security.
This release changes the behavior of secure-filters, but should be backwards-compatible with 1.0.5.
js
, jsObj
and jsAttr
filter now use a strict allow-list for
characters in strings. This is safer, but does increase the size of these
strings slightly. Compliant JSON and JavaScript parsers will not be affected
negatively by this change.jsAttr
was incorrect. It previously stated that <ha>, 'ha', "ha"
was escaped to <ha>, \'ha\', \"ha\"
© 2014 salesforce.com
Licensed under the BSD 3-clause license.
No vulnerabilities found.
Reason
no binaries found in the repo
Reason
0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Reason
license file detected
Details
Reason
security policy file detected
Details
Reason
project is archived
Details
Reason
Found 1/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Reason
no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Reason
project is not fuzzed
Details
Reason
branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Details
Reason
SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Details
Score
Last Scanned on 2024-11-18
The Open Source Security Foundation is a cross-industry collaboration to improve the security of open source software (OSS). The Scorecard provides security health metrics for open source projects.
Learn More