@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer

English | 简体中文

Schema rendering engine, the package mainly relies on @formilyrisk/react, its responsibilities are very simple, the core does two things:

• Parse the Form Schema protocol, recursive rendering
• Manage custom components

Installation

1npm install --save @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer

Contents

• Usage
  • Quick start
  • JSON Schema driver form rendering
  • JSchema driver form rendering
  • Non-single instance registration component
• Advanced tutorial
  • How to access third-party component libraries?
  • How to access the Form/FormItem component?
  • How to access form components?
  • How to handle form layout?
  • How to implement recursive rendering components?
  • How to implement the auto-increment list component?
  • How to implement ultra-complex custom components?
• API
  • connect
  • registerFormField
  • registerFormFields
  • registerFormComponent
  • registerFormItemComponent
  • registerVirtualBox
  • createVirtualBox
  • createControllerBox
  • getRegistry
  • cleanRegistry
• Classes
  • new Schema(json : ISchema)
    • get
    • merge
    • getEmptyValue
    • getSelfProps
    • getExtendsRules
    • getExtendsRequired
    • getExtendsEditable
    • getExtendsVisible
    • getExtendsDisplay
    • getExtendsTriggerType
    • getExtendsProps
    • getExtendsComponent
    • getExtendsComponentProps
    • getExtendsRenderer
    • getExtendsEffect
    • setProperty
    • setProperties
    • setArrayItems
    • getOrderProperties
    • mapProperties
    • toJSON
    • fromJSON
    • isObject
    • isArray()
• Components
  • <SchemaForm/>
  • <SchemaField/>
  • <SchemaMarkupForm/>
  • <SchemaMarkupField/>
  • <InternalForm/>
  • <InternalField/>
• Interfaces
  • IConnectOptions
  • ISchemaFieldComponentProps
  • ISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps
  • ISchemaFormRegistry
  • ISchema
  • ISchemaFormActions
  • ISchemaFormAsyncActions
  • IFormValidateResult
  • InternalFormats
  • ValidateDescription
  • ValidateResponse
  • CustomValidator
  • ValidatePatternRules

Usage

---

Quick start

If you are developing directly based on @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer, then you must register your custom component before development. Go to the renderer, otherwise our JSON-Schema protocol can't render the form. And so:

1import React from 'react'
2import {
3  SchemaForm,
4  registerFormField,
5  connect
6} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
7
8registerFormField(
9  'string',
10  connect()(({ value, onChange }) => {
11    return <input value={value} onChange={onChange} />
12  })
13)
14
15export default () => {
16  return (
17    <SchemaForm
18      schema={{
19        type: 'object',
20        properties: {
21          input: {
22            type: 'string'
23          }
24        }
25      }}
26      onChange={console.log} //{input:'this is your input string'}
27    />
28  )
29}

Great workmanship, this is the easiest way to use, the core is to register components, and then use the protocol to render.**One thing to note is that we used the connect function when registering components,The function of this connect function is to allow any component to be registered in the SchemaForm as long as it supports the value/onChange API.At the same time, the connect function also shields the Field API, so components that use the connect function cannot be more powerfully extended. The detailed connect API will be introduced later. ** At the same time, one thing to note is that if we want to access a set of component libraries, most of the component libraries in the industry have their Form and FormItem components.Their core is used to control styles, FormItem controls form local styles, and Form controls global form styles,So in a production environment, we need to register the Form and FormItem components so that the style is consistent with the original solution.How to register specifically, we will introduce in detail later.

JSON Schema driver form rendering

Speaking of JSON Schema, the above example has been covered. Of course, it is not complicated enough. Let's look at a more complicated example:

1import React from 'react'
2import { SchemaForm } from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
3
4registerFormField(
5  'string',
6  connect()(({ value, onChange }) => {
7    return <input value={value} onChange={onChange} />
8  })
9)
10
11registerFormField('array', () => {
12  return //...
13})
14
15export default () => {
16  return (
17    <SchemaForm
18      schema={{
19        type: 'object',
20        properties: {
21          array: {
22            type: 'array',
23            items: {
24              type: 'object',
25              properties: {
26                input: {
27                  type: 'string'
28                }
29              }
30            }
31          }
32        }
33      }}
34      onChange={console.log} //{array:[{input:'This is your input string'}]}
35    />
36  )
37}

The above code is a pseudo-code because we didn't register a custom component of type array. Here we don't talk about how to register custom components of the array type. Our core is to analyze how JSON Schema drives form rendering.Note:In SchemaForm, recursive rendering of properties of an object is built-in, but there is no recursive rendering of items with a built-in array.The main reason is that the recursive rendering of an array involves many style requirements, which is not convenient for built-in. So it’s best to leave it to the developer to implement it yourself. So, we will detail how to implement the recursive rendering requirements of the auto-increment list.

JSchema driver form rendering

JSchema describes JSON Schema in a more elegant way in jsx. We can implement a version of JSchema for the above example:

1import React from 'react'
2import {
3  SchemaMarkupForm as SchemaForm,
4  SchemaMarkupField as Field
5} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
6
7export default () => {
8  return (
9    <SchemaForm
10      onChange={console.log} //{array:[{input:'This is your input string'}]}
11    >
12      <Field type="array" name="array">
13        <Field type="object">
14          <Field type="string" name="input" />
15        </Field>
16      </Field>
17    </SchemaForm>
18  )
19}

As you can see, using JSchema to describe JSON Schema in your code is more elegant than JSON, greatly improving code maintainability.

Non-single instance registration component

In the previous example, we used the registerFormField API to register a custom component, which is the way to register a singleton,Its main advantage is the convenience, but there are also some problems, that is, the single case is easily contaminated, especially in the SPA page.If the developers of different pages are different, because sharing the same memory environment, then A developers may register custom components with the same name as B developers, which can easily lead to online failures.Therefore, we recommend users to use non-single registration methods:

1import React, { useMemo } from 'react'
2import {
3  SchemaForm,
4  registerFormField,
5  connect
6} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
7
8const StringField = connect()(({ value, onChange }) => {
9  return <input value={value} onChange={onChange} />
10})
11
12const useFields = () =>
13  useMemo(() => {
14    string: StringField
15  })
16
17export default () => {
18  return (
19    <SchemaForm
20      fields={useFields()}
21      schema={{
22        type: 'object',
23        properties: {
24          input: {
25            type: 'string'
26          }
27        }
28      }}
29      onChange={console.log} //{input:'this is your input string'}
30    />
31  )
32}

In the above example, we mainly pass the custom component in the props dimension of SchemaForm, so that we can guarantee the instance-level registration. This form is very friendly to the SPA.At the same time,It should be noted that we abstracted a React Hook of useFields, which is mainly used to solve the React Virtual DOM recalculation when the component is rendered multiple times, thus avoiding the repeated rendering of the form component.

Advanced tutorial

---

How to access third-party component libraries?

Because @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer is a base library, no component library is integrated by default. so in actual business development, If you want to customize it based on it, you have to face the problem of accessing third-party component libraries. How to access the third-party component library, let's divide it into the following steps:

• Access the Form/FormItem component
• Access component library form component
• Implement form layout components
• Implement an auto-increment list component

Let's take a step by step access to third-party component libraries! Here we mainly use the antd component library as an example.

How to access the Form/FormItem component?

The access method currently provides a global registration mechanism and a singleton registration mechanism. Global registration is mainly registered using two APIs, registerFormComponent and registerFormItemComponent.Singleton registration is to upload formComponent and formItemComponent directly in the SchemaForm property. If it is a SPA scene, it is recommended to use the singleton registration method. Let's look at the example below:

1import React from 'react'
2import {
3  SchemaForm,
4  registerFormComponent,
5  registerFormItemComponent
6} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
7import { Form } from 'antd'
8
9export const CompatFormComponent = ({ children, ...props }) => {
10  return <Form {...props}>{children}</Form> //Very simple to use the Form component, props is the props of the SchemaForm component, here will be directly transparent
11}
12
13export const CompatFormItemComponent = ({ children, ...props }) => {
14  const messages = [].concat(props.errors || [], props.warnings || [])
15  let status = ''
16  if (props.loading) {
17    status = 'validating'
18  }
19  if (props.invalid) {
20    status = 'error'
21  }
22  if (props.warnings && props.warnings.length) {
23    status = 'warning'
24  }
25  return (
26    <Form.Item
27      {...props}
28      label={props.schema.title}
29      help={
30        messages.length ? messages : props.schema && props.schema.description
31      }
32      validateStatus={status}
33    >
34      {children}
35    </Form.Item>
36  )
37}
38
39/***
40Global registration method
41registerFormComponent(CompatFormComponent)
42registerFormItemComponent(CompatFormItemComponent)
43***/
44
45//Single case registration method
46export default () => {
47  return (
48    <SchemaForm
49      formComponent={CompatFormComponent}
50      formItemComponent={CompatFormItemComponent}
51    />
52  )
53}

We can see that extending the overall or partial style of the form can be easily solved by simply extending the Form/FormItem component. It should be noted here that the props received by the FormItem component are a bit complicated. Don't worry, the detailed props API will be listed later. Now we just need to know how it is probably registered.

How to access form components?

all components of the component library are atomic components, most of them are compatible with the value/onChange specification, so we can quickly access the components of the component library with the connect function. Usually, if we need access to the component library component, we probably do three things:

• Handle state maps, map the loading/error state inside the formily to the component properties, of course, the premise is that the component must support styles such as loading or error.
• Handle detail styles, map the editable state inside the formily to a PreviewText component for more friendly and cleaner presentation data.
• Handle component enumeration, let's think about it, JSON Schema, each node should support the enum attribute, If we have the enum attribute, we'd better show it in the form of Select, so we need to handle the component enumeration state.

Let's take an example of InputNumber：

1import React from 'react'
2import { connect, registerFormField } from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
3import { InputNumber } from 'antd'
4
5const mapTextComponent = (
6  Target: React.JSXElementConstructor<any>,
7  props: any = {},
8  fieldProps: any = {}
9): React.JSXElementConstructor<any> => {
10  const { editable } = fieldProps
11  if (editable !== undefined) {
12    if (editable === false) {
13      return PreviewText
14    }
15  }
16  if (Array.isArray(props.dataSource)) {
17    return Select
18  }
19  return Target
20}
21
22const mapStyledProps = (
23  props: IConnectProps,
24  fieldProps: MergedFieldComponentProps
25) => {
26  const { loading, errors } = fieldProps
27  if (loading) {
28    props.state = props.state || 'loading'
29  } else if (errors && errors.length) {
30    props.state = 'error'
31  }
32}
33
34const acceptEnum = (component: React.JSXElementConstructor<any>) => {
35  return ({ dataSource, ...others }) => {
36    if (dataSource) {
37      return React.createElement(Select, { dataSource, ...others })
38    } else {
39      return React.createElement(component, others)
40    }
41  }
42}
43
44registerFormField(
45  'number',
46  connect({
47    getProps: mapStyledProps, //Process state map
48    getComponent: mapTextComponent //Process details
49  })(acceptEnum(InputNumber)) //Process enumeration states
50)

In this example, we use the connect function in depth. Connect is a HOC. During the rendering phase, it can add some intermediate processing logic to the component rendering process to help dynamic distribution. Of course, connect has a lot of APIs, which will be covered in detail later.

How to handle form layout?

JSON Schema describes the form of data structure, which is supported by nature. But the form ends up at the UI level. Unfortunately, at the UI level, we have a lot of components that are not a specific data node of JSON Schema. It's just a UI node. So, how to do to describe complex layouts in JSON Schema?

Now formily's approach is to abstract a concept called virtual nodeAfter the user specifies a JSON Schema x-component as a virtual node at the code level, whether it is rendering, data processing, or final data submission, as long as the node is virtual, it will not be treated as a normal data node. So, with the concept of this virtual node, we can describe various complex layouts in JSON Schema. Let's try to write a layout component:

1import React from 'react'
2import { SchemaForm, registerVirtualBox } from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
3import { Card } from 'antd'
4
5registerVirtualBox('card', ({ children, ...props }) => {
6  return <Card {...props.schema.getExtendsComponentProps()}>{children}</Card>
7})
8
9export default () => {
10  return (
11    <SchemaForm
12      schema={{
13        type: 'object',
14        properties: {
15          layout_card: {
16            //layout_cardThe name of this property, whatever you change will not affect the final submitted data structure
17            type: 'object',
18            'x-component': 'card',
19            'x-component-props': {
20              title: 'This is Card'
21            },
22            properties: {
23              array: {
24                type: 'array',
25                items: {
26                  type: 'object',
27                  properties: {
28                    input: {
29                      type: 'string'
30                    }
31                  }
32                }
33              }
34            }
35          }
36        }
37      }}
38    />
39  )
40}

From this pseudo-code, we can see that the card is a normal Object Schema node, just need to specify an x-component as card, so that it can match the card registered by registerVirtualBox, it will achieve the effect of virtual node. So, no matter what you change the name of the property in JSON Schema, it will not affect the final submitted data structure.It should be noted here that x-component-props is directly passed to the callback function parameters of registerVirtualBox. This is the use of the JSON Schema form, and we also use JSchema:

1import React from 'react'
2import { SchemaForm, createVirtualBox } from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
3import { Card } from 'antd'
4
5const Card = createVirtualBox('card', ({ children, ...props }) => {
6  return <Card {...props}>{children}</Card>
7})
8
9export default () => {
10  return (
11    <SchemaForm>
12      <Card title="This is Card">
13        <Field type="array" name="array">
14          <Field type="object">
15            <Field type="string" name="input" />
16          </Field>
17        </Field>
18      </Card>
19    </SchemaForm>
20  )
21}

From this example we can see that with the createVirtualBox API you can quickly create a layout component that you can use directly in JSchema.In fact, the internal implementation of createVirtualBox is very simple, just use registerVitualBox and SchemaMarkupField：

1import React from 'react'
2import { SchemaMarkupField as Field } from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
3export function createVirtualBox<T = {}>(
4  key: string,
5  component?: React.JSXElementConstructor<React.PropsWithChildren<T>>
6) {
7  registerVirtualBox(
8    key,
9    component
10      ? ({ props, schema, children }) => {
11          return React.createElement(component, {
12            ...schema.getExtendsComponentProps(),
13            children
14          })
15        }
16      : () => <Fragment />
17  )
18  const VirtualBox: React.FC<T & { name?: string }> = ({
19    children,
20    name,
21    ...props
22  }) => {
23    return (
24      <Field
25        type="object"
26        name={name}
27        x-component={key}
28        x-props={props}
29        x-component-props={props}
30      >
31        {children}
32      </Field>
33    )
34  }
35  return VirtualBox
36}

The way to register the layout components described above is a singleton registration. If we need registration in the form of an instance, it is still similar to the way we said earlier.

1import React from 'react'
2import { Card as AntdCard } from 'antd'
3const Card = ({children,...props})=>{
4  return <AntdCard {...props.schema.getExtendsComponentProps()}>{children}</Card>
5}
6
7export default ()=>{
8  return (
9    <SchemaForm
10      virtualFields={{
11        card:Card
12      }}
13      schema={{
14        type:"object",
15          properties:{
16            layout_card:{//layout_cardThe name of this property, whatever you change will not affect the final submitted data structure
17              type:"object",
18              "x-component":"card",
19              "x-component-props":{
20                 title:"This is Card"
21              },
22              properties:{
23                array:{
24                  type:"array",
25                    items:{
26                      type:"object",
27                        properties:{
28                          input:{
29                            type:"string"
30                          }
31                        }
32                    }
33                }
34              }
35            }
36          }
37      }}
38    />
39  )
40}

How to implement recursive rendering components?

What is a recursive rendering component? In fact, implement the components of properties and items in JSON Schema，sucn astype:"string" This kind of node belongs to the atomic node and is not a recursive rendering component. The layout component mentioned above, it is also a recursive rendering component, but it fixes the rendering mode, so it can be easily registered. So, most of us want to implement recursive rendering of the scene,Perhaps more of a scene in`type:"array"will implement recursive rendering. Below we will detail the implementation of the auto-increment list component.

How to implement the auto-increment list component?

The self-increment list has several main features:

• Independent style
• Support for recursive rendering of subcomponents
• Support for adding, deleting, moving up, down moving array items
• Cannot be wrapped with the connect function because the Field API must be called

In order to help you better understand how to implement the auto-increment list component, we will not implement the specific style, and more is to teach you how to implement recursive rendering and array item operations. Let us look at the pseudo-code:

1import React, { Fragment } from 'react'
2import {
3  registerFormField,
4  SchemaField,
5  FormPath
6} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
7
8//No need to pack with connet
9registerFormField('array', ({ value, path, mutators }) => {
10  const emptyUI = (
11    <button
12      onClick={() => {
13        mutators.push()
14      }}
15    >
16      Add Element
17    </button>
18  )
19
20  const listUI = value.map((item, index) => {
21    return (
22      <div key={index}>
23        <SchemaField path={FormPath.parse(path).concat(index)} />
24        <button
25          onClick={() => {
26            mutators.remove(index)
27          }}
28        >
29          remove
30        </button>
31        <button
32          onClick={() => {
33            mutators.moveDown(index)
34          }}
35        >
36          move down
37        </button>
38        <button
39          onClick={() => {
40            mutators.moveUp(index)
41          }}
42        >
43          move up
44        </button>
45      </div>
46    )
47  })
48
49  return value.length == 0 ? emptyUI : listUI
50})

To implement a self-incrementing list component with recursive rendering is super simple. On the contrary, it would be a bit cumbersome to implement related styles. In short, the core is to use the SchemaField component and the mutators API, the specific API will be described in detail later.

How to implement ultra-complex custom components?

This problem is no solution in the old Formily.It happens that because our business complexity is high to a certain extent, we are limited by this problem, so we must find a way to solve this problem. We can define what is a super complex custom component:

• There are a large number of form components inside the component, and there are also a large number of linkage relationships inside.

• There is a private server dynamic rendering scheme inside the component.

• There is a complex layout structure inside the component

In these three points, meet the characteristics of ultra-complex custom components, For this scenario, why can't we solve the problem by properly encapsulating the form of a custom component? In fact, it is mainly limited to verification, there is no way to check the whole, so we need an ability to aggregate a large amount of field processing logic. Let's take a look at the specific solution：

1import React, { Fragment } from 'react'
2import {
3  registerFormField,
4  SchemaField,
5  FormPath,
6  InternalField,
7  useFormEffects,
8  FormEffectHooks
9} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
10import { Input, Form } from 'antd'
11
12const FormItem = ({ component, ...props }) => {
13  return (
14    <InternalField {...props}>
15      {({ state, mutators }) => {
16        const messages = [].concat(state.errors || [], state.warnings || [])
17        let status = ''
18        if (state.loading) {
19          status = 'validating'
20        }
21        if (state.invalid) {
22          status = 'error'
23        }
24        if (state.warnings && state.warnings.length) {
25          status = 'warning'
26        }
27        return (
28          <Form.Item
29            {...props}
30            help={messages.length ? messages : props.help && props.help}
31            validateStatus={status}
32          >
33            {React.createElement(component, {
34              ...state.props,
35              value: state.value,
36              onChange: mutators.change,
37              onBlur: mutators.blur,
38              onFocus: mutators.focus
39            })}
40          </Form.Item>
41        )
42      }}
43    </InternalField>
44  )
45}
46
47//No need to pack with connet
48registerFormField('complex', ({ path }) => {
49  useFormEffects(({ setFieldState }) => {
50    FormEffectHooks.onFieldValueChange$('ccc').subscribe(({ value }) => {
51      if (value === '123') {
52        setFieldState('ddd', state => {
53          state.value = 'this is linkage relationship'
54        })
55      }
56    })
57  })
58
59  return (
60    <>
61      <FormItem name={FormPath.parse(path).concat('aaa')} component={Input} />
62      <FormItem name={FormPath.parse(path).concat('bbb')} component={Input} />
63      <FormItem name="ccc" component={Input} />
64      <FormItem name="ddd" component={Input} />
65    </>
66  )
67})

In this pseudo-code, we mainly use two core APIs, mainly useFormEffects and InternalField,useFormEffects gives developers a place to write the effects logic locally, so that the effects logic can be easily reused. InternalField is the @formilyrisk/react Field component. You can take a look at the @formilyrisk/react documentation. SchemaForm also uses @formilyrisk/react internally, it can share the same Context, so we can easily use InternalField inside a custom component. Also note that when using InternalField directly, the name we registered is the root level name, if you want to reuse the path of the current custom component, you can use FormPath to resolve the path, and then concat.

API

---

The overall API fully inherits @formilyrisk/core and @formilyrisk/react, and only the specific APIs of @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer are listed below.

connect

Custom component registration bridge, a high-level component function (HOC) that is used primarily to quickly access most component library components (components that implement the value/onChange API)

Signature

1connect(options?: IConnectOptions): (component : React.JSXElementConstructor<any>)=>(fieldProps:ISchemaFieldComponentProps)=>JSX.Element

Usage

1import { registerFormField, connect } from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
2import { Select } from 'antd'
3registerFormField('select', connect()(Select))

registerFormField

Register custom component functions

Signature

1registerFormField(
2  name:string,
3  component: React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaFieldComponentProps>
4)

registerFormFields

Bulk registration of custom components

Signature

1registerFormFields(
2  fieldsMap: {
3    [key : string]: React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaFieldComponentProps>
4  }
5)

registerFormComponent

Register Form Style Component

Signature

1registerFormComponent<Props>(
2  component:React.JSXElementConstructor<Props>
3)

registerFormItemComponent

Register the FormItem style component

Signature

1registerFormItemComponent(
2  component:React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaFieldComponentProps>
3)

registerVirtualBox

Register the virtual box component, mainly used to describe the layout in JSON Schema

Signature

1registerVirtualBox(
2  name:string,
3  component:React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps>
4)

createVirtualBox

Create a virtual box component, the returned component can be used directly in SchemaMarkupForm

Signature

1createVirtualBox<Props>(
2  name:string,
3  component:React.JSXElementConstructor<Props>
4) : React.FC<Props>

Usage

1import React from 'react'
2import {
3  SchemaMarkupForm as SchemaForm,
4  SchemaMarkupField as Field,
5  createVirtualBox
6} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
7import { Card } from 'antd'
8
9const FormCard = createVirtualBox('card', props => {
10  return <Card {...props} />
11})
12
13export default () => (
14  <SchemaForm>
15    <FormCard title="This is card">
16      <Field name="aaa" type="string" />
17    </FormCard>
18  </SchemaForm>
19)

createControllerBox

Creating a virtual box component, the returned component can be used directly in SchemaMarkupForm, it is different from createVirtualBox mainly because the component receives the props The props received by createVirtualBox is the simplest component props createControllerBox receivesISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps

Signature

1createControllerBox<Props>(
2  name:string,
3  component:React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps>
4) : React.FC<Props>

Usage

1import React from 'react'
2import {
3  SchemaMarkupForm as SchemaForm,
4  SchemaMarkupField as Field,
5  createControllerBox
6} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
7import { Card } from 'antd'
8
9const FormCard = createControllerBox('card', ({ schema, children }) => {
10  return <Card {...schema.getExtendsComponentProps()}>{children}</Card>
11})
12
13export default () => (
14  <SchemaForm>
15    <FormCard title="This is card">
16      <Field name="aaa" type="string" />
17    </FormCard>
18  </SchemaForm>
19)

getRegistry

Get the registry, all components registered through the registerFormXXX API are managed in the registry

Signature

1getRegistry(): ISchemaFormRegistry

cleanRegistry

Clear the registry and clear all components registered via the registerFormXXX API

Signature

1cleanRegistry(): void

Classes

The whole Class inherits @formilyrisk/core completely, such as FormPath and FormLifeCyle. Only the classes specific to @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer are listed below.

new Schema(json : ISchema)

The Schema parsing engine, given a data that satisfies the JSON Schema, we will parse it into the corresponding Schema instance, and we can quickly process some things with some tool methods. At the same time, the Schema Class provides a unified protocol difference smoothing capability to ensure Seamless and smooth upgrade when the protocol is upgraded

Attributes

Attribute name	Description	Type
title	Field title	React.ReactNode
name	The parent property name of the field	string
description	Field description	React.ReactNode
default	Field default	any
readOnly	Whether read-only and editable	boolean
type	Field Type	`'string'
enum	Enumerate data	`Array<string
const	Check if the field value is equal to the value of const	any
multipleOf	Check if the field value can be divisible by the value of multipleOf	number
maximum	Check the maximum value (greater than)	number
exclusiveMaximum	Check the maximum value (greater than or equal to)	number
minimum	Check minimum value (less than)	number
exclusiveMinimum	Minimum value (less than or equal to)	number
maxLength	Check maximum length	number
minLength	Check minimum length	number
pattern	Regular check rule	`string
maxItems	Maximum number of entries	number
minItems	Minimum number of entries	number
uniqueItems	Whether to check for duplicates	boolean
maxProperties	Maximum number of attributes	number
minProperties	Minimum number of attributes	number
required	Required	boolean
format	Regular rule type	InternalFormats
properties	Object property	{[key : string]:Schema}
items	Array description	`Schema
additionalItems	Extra array element description	Schema
patternProperties	Dynamically match the schema of an attribute of an object	{[key : string]:Schema}
additionalProperties	Schema matching the extra attributes of the object	Schema
editable	Whether the field is editable	boolean
visible	Whether the data and style is visible	boolean
display	Whether the style is visible	boolean
x-props	Field extension attribute	{ [name: string]: any }
x-index	Field order	number
x-rules	Field check rule	ValidatePatternRules
x-component	Field UI component	string
x-component-props	Field UI component properties	{}
x-render	Field extension rendering function	<T = ISchemaFieldComponentProps>(props: T & { renderComponent: () => React.ReactElement}) => React.ReactElement
x-effect	Field side effect trigger	(dispatch: (type: string, payload: any) => void,option?:object) => { [key: string]: any }

Method

get

Get the Schema child node according to the data path

Signature

1get(path?: FormPathPattern): Schema

Usage

1const schema = new Schema({
2  type: 'object',
3  properties: {
4    array: {
5      type: 'array',
6      items: {
7        type: 'object',
8        properties: {
9          input: {
10            type: 'string'
11          }
12        }
13      }
14    }
15  }
16})
17
18schema.get('array[0].input') //{type:"string"}

merge

Merge Schema

Signature

1merge(spec:ISchema): Schema

Usage

1const schema = new Schema({
2  type: 'object',
3  properties: {
4    array: {
5      type: 'array',
6      items: {
7        type: 'object',
8        properties: {
9          input: {
10            type: 'string'
11          }
12        }
13      }
14    }
15  }
16})
17
18schema.merge({
19  title: 'root object'
20})
21/**
22{
23  type:"object",
24  title:"root object",
25  properties:{
26    array:{
27      type:'array',
28      items:{
29        type:'object',
30        properties:{
31          input:{
32            type:'string'
33          }
34        }
35      }
36    }
37  }
38}
39**/

getEmptyValue

Get the null value of the current Schema based on the type of Schema

Signature

1getEmptyValue() : '' | [] | {} | 0

Usage

1const schema = new Schema({
2  type: 'object',
3  properties: {
4    array: {
5      type: 'array',
6      items: {
7        type: 'object',
8        properties: {
9          input: {
10            type: 'string'
11          }
12        }
13      }
14    }
15  }
16})
17
18schema.get('array.0.input').getEmptyValue() // ''
19schema.get('array.0').getEmptyValue() // {}
20schema.get('array').getEmptyValue() // []
21schema.getEmptyValue() // {}

getSelfProps

Get no nested Schema properties (does not include nested properties like properties/items)

Signature

1getSelfProps() : ISchema

Usage

1const schema = new Schema({
2  type: 'object',
3  properties: {
4    array: {
5      type: 'array',
6      items: {
7        type: 'object',
8        properties: {
9          input: {
10            type: 'string'
11          }
12        }
13      }
14    }
15  }
16})
17
18schema.getSelfProps() // { type:"object" }

getExtendsRules

Get the extended check rule. This method is more complicated. It will parse the attributes and x-rules attributes of all the check types of the current Schema, and finally merge them into a unified rules structure.

Signature

1getExtendsRules() : ValidateArrayRules

Usage

1const schema = new Schema({
2  type:"string",
3  required:true,
4  maxLength:10
5  "x-rules":{
6    pattern:/^\d+$/
7  }
8})
9
10schema.getExtendsRules() // [{required:true},{max:10},{pattern:/^\d+$/}]

getExtendsRequired

Obtaining whether it is required or not is actually reading the required attribute of the Schema. Why is it encapsulated into a method to ensure that the user is not aware of the protocol upgrade? We only need to ensure backward compatibility of the method.

Signature

1getExtendsRequired(): void | boolean

Usage

1const schema = new Schema({
2  type:"string",
3  required:true,
4  maxLength:10
5  "x-rules":{
6    pattern:/^\d+$/
7  }
8})
9
10schema.getExtendsRequired() // true

getExtendsEditable

Get the editable state of the Schema, consistent with the getExtendsEditable ability, also to smooth out the protocol differences

Signature

1getExtendsEditable() : void | boolean

Usage

1const schema1 = new Schema({
2  type: 'string',
3  editable: false
4})
5
6schema1.getExtendsEditable() // false
7
8const schema2 = new Schema({
9  type: 'string',
10  readOnly: true
11})
12
13schema2.getExtendsEditable() // false
14
15const schema3 = new Schema({
16  type: 'string',
17  'x-props': {
18    editable: false
19  }
20})
21
22schema3.getExtendsEditable() // false
23
24const schema4 = new Schema({
25  type: 'string',
26  'x-component-props': {
27    editable: false
28  }
29})
30
31schema4.getExtendsEditable() // false

getExtendsVisible

Get data and style visible property

签名

1getExtendsVisible(): boolean

getExtendsDisplay

Get style visible property

签名

getExtendsDisplay() : boolean

getExtendsTriggerType

Get the triggerType, which is consistent with the getExtendsTriggerType capability, and is capable of providing protocol differences.

Signature

1getExtendsTriggerType() : 'onBlur' | 'onChange' | string

Usage

1const schema1 = new Schema({
2  type: 'string',
3  'x-props': {
4    triggerType: 'onBlur'
5  }
6})
7
8schema1.getExtendsTriggerType() // onBlur
9
10const schema2 = new Schema({
11  type: 'string',
12  'x-component-props': {
13    triggerType: 'onBlur'
14  }
15})
16
17schema2.getExtendsTriggerType() // onBlur
18
19const schema3 = new Schema({
20  type: 'string',
21  'x-item-props': {
22    triggerType: 'onBlur'
23  }
24})
25
26schema3.getExtendsTriggerType() // onBlur

getExtendsProps

Get the x-props attribute

Signature

1getExtendsProps() : {}

getExtendsComponent

Get the x-props attribute

Signature

1getExtendsComponent() : string

getExtendsComponentProps

Get the x-component-props property, which is the component property of the x-component

Signature

1getExtendsComponentProps() : {}

getExtendsRenderer

Get the x-render attribute

Signature

1getExtendsRenderer() : <T = ISchemaFieldComponentProps>(
2    props: T & {
3      renderComponent: () => React.ReactElement
4    }
5  ) => React.ReactElement

getExtendsEffect

Get the x-effect attribute

Signature

1getExtendsEffect() : (
2    dispatch: (type: string, payload: any) => void,
3    option?: object
4) => { [key: string]: any }

setProperty

Set properties for the current schema

Signature

1setProperty(key: string, schema: ISchema): Schema

setProperties

Set properties for the current Schema batch

Signature

1setProperties(properties: {[key : string]:ISchema}) : {[key : string]:Schema}

setArrayItems

Set the items property to the current schema

Signature

1setArrayItems(schema:Ischema) : Schema

getOrderProperties

Give all properties in x-index order

Signature

1getOrderProperties() : {schema:Schema,key:string}[]

mapProperties

Traverse the properties of the schema in order (x-index)

Signature

1mapProperties(callback?: (schema: Schema, key: string) => any):any[]

toJSON

Output no loop dependent json data structure

Signature

toJSON() : ISchema

fromJSON

Generate a Schema object based on a json parsing

Signature

1fromJSON(json : ISchema) : Schema

isObject

Determine whether the current schema is an object type

Signature

isObject() : boolean

isArray()

Determine if the current schema is an array type

Signature

isArray() : boolean

Components

---

The whole component is completely inherited @formilyrisk/react, only the components specific to @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer are listed below.

<SchemaForm/>

The core JSON Schema rendering component

Attributes

1interface ISchemaFormProps<
2  Value = any,
3  DefaultValue = any,
4  FormEffectPayload = any,
5  FormActions = ISchemaFormActions | ISchemaFormAsyncActions
6> {
7  //Form value
8  value?: Value
9  //Form default value
10  defaultValue?: DefaultValue
11  //Form default value, weakly controlled
12  initialValues?: DefaultValue
13  //Form actions
14  actions?: FormActions
15  //Form effects
16  effects?: IFormEffect<FormEffectPayload, FormActions>
17  //Form instance
18  form?: IForm
19  //Form change callback
20  onChange?: (values: Value) => void
21  //Form submission callback
22  onSubmit?: (values: Value) => void | Promise<Value>
23  //Form reset callback
24  onReset?: () => void
25  //Form validation failure callback
26  onValidateFailed?: (valideted: IFormValidateResult) => void
27  //Form child node
28  children?: React.ReactElement
29  //Whether to open the dirty check
30  useDirty?: boolean
31  //Is it editable
32  editable?: boolean | ((name: string) => boolean)
33  //Whether to enable pessimistic verification, if the first verification fails, stop the remaining verification
34  validateFirst?: boolean
35  //Form Schema object
36  schema?: ISchema
37  //Instance level registration custom component
38  fields?: ISchemaFormRegistry['fields']
39  //Instance level registration virtual box component
40  virtualFields?: ISchemaFormRegistry['virtualFields']
41  //Instance level registration Form style component
42  formComponent?: ISchemaFormRegistry['formComponent']
43  //Instance level registration FormItem style component
44  formItemComponent?: ISchemaFormRegistry['formItemComponent']
45}

<SchemaField/>

Based on a Data Path, it automatically finds and renders the internal components of the Schema node, mainly used to implement recursive rendering within the custom component.

Attributes

1interface ISchemaFieldProps {
2  //Data path
3  path?: FormPathPattern
4}

<SchemaMarkupForm/>

Let SchemaForm support the Form component of jsx tabbed notation, which needs to be used together with SchemaMarkupField

Attributes

1interface ISchemaFormProps<
2  Value = any,
3  DefaultValue = any,
4  FormEffectPayload = any,
5  FormActions = ISchemaFormActions | ISchemaFormAsyncActions
6> {
7  //Form value
8  value?: Value
9  //Form default value
10  defaultValue?: DefaultValue
11  //Form default value, weakly controlled
12  initialValues?: DefaultValue
13  //Form actions
14  actions?: FormActions
15  //Form effects
16  effects?: IFormEffect<FormEffectPayload, FormActions>
17  //Form instance
18  form?: IForm
19  //Form change callback
20  onChange?: (values: Value) => void
21  //Form submission callback
22  onSubmit?: (values: Value) => void | Promise<Value>
23  //Form reset callback
24  onReset?: () => void
25  //Form validation failure callback
26  onValidateFailed?: (valideted: IFormValidateResult) => void
27  //Form child node
28  children?: React.ReactElement
29  //Whether to open the dirty check
30  useDirty?: boolean
31  //Is it editable
32  editable?: boolean | ((name: string) => boolean)
33  //Whether to enable pessimistic verification, if the first verification fails, stop the remaining verification
34  validateFirst?: boolean
35  //Form Schema object
36  schema?: ISchema
37  //Instance level registration custom component
38  fields?: ISchemaFormRegistry['fields']
39  //Instance level registration virtual box component
40  virtualFields?: ISchemaFormRegistry['virtualFields']
41  //Instance level registration Form style component
42  formComponent?: ISchemaFormRegistry['formComponent']
43  //Instance level registration FormItem style component
44  formItemComponent?: ISchemaFormRegistry['formItemComponent']
45}

Usage

1import {
2  SchemaMarkupForm as SchemaForm,
3  SchemaMarkupField as Field
4} from '@formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer'
5
6export default () => {
7  return (
8    <SchemaForm>
9      <Field name="aa" type="string" />
10    </SchemaForm>
11  )
12}

<SchemaMarkupField/>

The SchemaForm supports the Field component of jsx tabbed notation, which needs to be used together with SchemaMarkupForm

Attributes

1type IMarkupSchemaFieldProps = ISchema

<InternalForm/>

The core Form is the same as the Form component in @formilyrisk/react

<InternalField/>

The core Field, like the Field component in @formilyrisk/react, is mainly used in complex custom components.

Interfaces

---

Inheriting @formilyrisk/react and @formilyrisk/core's Interfaces as a whole, only @formilyrisk/react-schema-renderer are listed below.

IConnectOptions

Connect parameters for registered components

1interface IConnectOptions {
2  valueName?: string //value name
3  eventName?: string //get value callback name
4  defaultProps?: {} //component default props
5  getValueFromEvent?: (event?: any, value?: any) => any //get value from event callback.
6  getProps?: (
7    //props transformer
8    componentProps: {},
9    fieldProps: MergedFieldComponentProps
10  ) => {} | void
11  getComponent?: (
12    //component transformer
13    Target: any,
14    componentProps: {},
15    fieldProps: MergedFieldComponentProps
16  ) => React.JSXElementConstructor<any>
17}

ISchemaFieldComponentProps

It is very important to customize the properties received by the component. As long as it involves developing custom components, you need to understand the protocol.

1interface ISchemaFieldComponentProps {
2  //State name, FieldState
3  displayName?: string
4  //Data path
5  name: string
6  //Node path
7  path: string
8  //Whether it has been initialized
9  initialized: boolean
10  //Whether it is in the original state, the state is true only when value===intialValues
11  pristine: boolean
12  //Whether it is in a legal state, as long as the error length is greater than 0, the valid is false.
13  valid: boolean
14  //Whether it is in an illegal state, as long as the error length is greater than 0, the valid is true.
15  invalid: boolean
16  //Is it in check state?
17  validating: boolean
18  //Whether it is modified, if the value changes, the property is true and will be true for the entire lifetime of the field.
19  modified: boolean
20  //Whether it is touched
21  touched: boolean
22  //Whether it is activated, it will be triggered to true when the field triggers the onFocus event, and false when onBlur is triggered.
23  active: boolean
24  //Whether it has been accessed, when the field triggers the onBlur event, it will be triggered to true
25  visited: boolean
26  //Is it visible, note: if the status is false, the value of the field will not be submitted, and the UI will not display
27  visible: boolean
28  //Whether to show, note: if the status is false, then the value of the field will be submitted, the UI will not display, similar to the form hidden field
29  display: boolean
30  //Is it editable
31  editable: boolean
32  //Whether it is in the loading state, note: if the field is in asynchronous check, loading is true
33  loading: boolean
34  //The field has multiple parameters. For example, when the field onChange is triggered, multi-parameter data is passed to the event callback, then the values of all parameters are stored here.
35  values: any[]
36  //Field error message
37  errors: string[]
38  //Field alert message
39  warnings: string[]
40  //Field value, which is constant equal to values[0]
41  value: any
42  //Initial value
43  initialValue: any
44  //Verification rules, specific type descriptions refer to the following documents
45  rules: ValidatePatternRules[]
46  //Required or not
47  required: boolean
48  //Has it been mounted?
49  mounted: boolean
50  //Has it been unmounted?
51  unmounted: boolean
52  //Field extension property, under the SchemaForm ISchema structure
53  props: ISchema
54  //The schema object of the current field
55  schema: Schema
56  //Current operation data set of the field
57  mutators: IMutators
58  //Form instance
59  form: IForm
60  //Recursive rendering function
61  renderField: (
62    addtionKey: string | number,
63    reactKey?: string | number
64  ) => React.ReactElement
65}

ISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps

The attributes received by the virtual field component, as long as it involves registering the virtual field, you need to understand the protocol.

1interface ISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps {
2  //State name, VirtualFieldState
3  displayName: string
4  //Field data path
5  name: string
6  //Field node path
7  path: string
8  //Whether it has been initialized
9  initialized: boolean
10  //Is it visible, note: if the status is false, the UI will not be displayed, and the data will not be submitted (because it is a VirtualField)
11  visible: boolean
12  //Whether to show, note: if the state is false, the UI will not be displayed, and the data will not be submitted (because it is a VirtualField)
13  display: boolean
14  //Has it been mounted?
15  mounted: boolean
16  //Has it been unmounted?
17  unmounted: boolean
18  //Field extension attribute
19  props: ISchema
20  //The schema object of the current field
21  schema: Schema
22  //Form instance
23  form: IForm
24  //Child element
25  children: React.ReactElement[]
26  //Recursive rendering function
27  renderField: (
28    addtionKey: string | number,
29    reactKey?: string | number
30  ) => React.ReactElement
31}

ISchemaFormRegistry

The component registry, whether it is a normal field, a virtual field, or a Form/FormItem will be registered here.

1interface ISchemaFormRegistry {
2  fields: {
3    [key: string]: React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaFieldComponentProps>
4  }
5  virtualFields: {
6    [key: string]: React.JSXElementConstructor<
7      ISchemaVirtualFieldComponentProps
8    >
9  }
10  formItemComponent: React.JSXElementConstructor<ISchemaFieldComponentProps>
11  formComponent: string | React.JSXElementConstructor<any>
12}

ISchema

Schema protocol object, mainly used to constrain a json structure to satisfy the Schema protocol

1interface ISchema {
2  /** base json schema spec**/
3  title?: React.ReactNode
4  description?: React.ReactNode
5  default?: any
6  readOnly?: boolean
7  writeOnly?: boolean
8  type?: 'string' | 'object' | 'array' | 'number' | string
9  enum?: Array<string | number | { label: React.ReactNode; value: any }>
10  const?: any
11  multipleOf?: number
12  maximum?: number
13  exclusiveMaximum?: number
14  minimum?: number
15  exclusiveMinimum?: number
16  maxLength?: number
17  minLength?: number
18  pattern?: string | RegExp
19  maxItems?: number
20  minItems?: number
21  uniqueItems?: boolean
22  maxProperties?: number
23  minProperties?: number
24  required?: string[] | boolean
25  format?: string
26  /** nested json schema spec **/
27  properties?: {
28    [key: string]: ISchema
29  }
30  items?: ISchema | ISchema[]
31  additionalItems?: ISchema
32  patternProperties?: {
33    [key: string]: ISchema
34  }
35  additionalProperties?: ISchema
36  /** extend json schema specs */
37  visible?: boolean //Field initial visible status(Whether the data is visible)
38  display?: boolean //Field initial display status(Whether the style is visible)
39  editable?: boolean
40  ['x-props']?: { [name: string]: any }
41  ['x-index']?: number
42  ['x-rules']?: ValidatePatternRules
43  ['x-linkages']?: Array<{
44    target: FormPathPattern
45    type: string
46    [key: string]: any
47  }>
48  ['x-mega-props']?: { [name: string]: any }
49  ['x-component']?: string
50  ['x-component-props']?: { [name: string]: any }
51  ['x-render']?: <T = ISchemaFieldComponentProps>(
52    props: T & {
53      renderComponent: () => React.ReactElement
54    }
55  ) => React.ReactElement
56  ['x-effect']?: (
57    dispatch: (type: string, payload: any) => void,
58    option?: object
59  ) => { [key: string]: any }
60}

ISchemaFormActions

The core actions inherit @formilyrisk/react's IFormActions, mainly adding the getSchema API

1interface ISchemaFormActions extends IFormActions {
2  getSchema(): Schema
3  getFormSchema(): Schema
4}

ISchemaFormAsyncActions

Core actions inherit @formilyrisk/react's IFormAsyncActions, mainly adding the getSchema API

1interface ISchemaFormAsyncActions extends IFormAsyncActions {
2  getSchema(): Promise<Schema>
3  getFormSchema(): Promise<Schema>
4}

IFormValidateResult

Calibration result

1interface IFormValidateResult {
2  errors: Array<{
3    path: string
4    messages: string[]
5  }>
6  warnings: Array<{
7    path: string
8    messages: string[]
9  }>
10}

InternalFormats

Built-in format checksum

1type InternalFormats =
2  | 'url'
3  | 'email'
4  | 'ipv6'
5  | 'ipv4'
6  | 'idcard'
7  | 'taodomain'
8  | 'qq'
9  | 'phone'
10  | 'money'
11  | 'zh'
12  | 'date'
13  | 'zip'
14  | string

ValidateDescription

Original check description

1interface ValidateDescription {
2  // built-in rules，ref: string rules
3  format?: InternalFormats
4  // custom validation
5  validator?: CustomValidator
6  // required
7  required?: boolean
8  // pattern
9  pattern?: RegExp | string
10  // max length
11  max?: number
12  // maximum
13  maximum?: number
14  // exclusiveMaximum
15  exclusiveMaximum?: number
16  // exclusiveMinimum
17  exclusiveMinimum?: number
18  // minimum
19  minimum?: number
20  // min
21  min?: number
22  // length
23  len?: number
24  // whitespace
25  whitespace?: boolean
26  // enum
27  enum?: any[]
28  // error message
29  message?: string
30  [key: string]: any
31}

ValidateResponse

1type SyncValidateResponse =
2  | null
3  | string
4  | boolean
5  | {
6      type?: 'error' | 'warning'
7      message: string
8    }
9type AsyncValidateResponse = Promise<SyncValidateResponse>
10type ValidateResponse = SyncValidateResponse | AsyncValidateResponse

CustomValidator

Custom check function

1type CustomValidator = (
2  value: any,
3  description?: ValidateDescription
4) => ValidateResponse

ValidatePatternRules

Verification rule set

1type ValidatePatternRules =
2  | InternalFormats
3  | CustomValidator
4  | ValidateDescription
5  | Array<InternalFormats | CustomValidator | ValidateDescription>