Gathering detailed insights and metrics for node-fs-extra
Gathering detailed insights and metrics for node-fs-extra
Gathering detailed insights and metrics for node-fs-extra
Gathering detailed insights and metrics for node-fs-extra
fs-extra-promise
Node file system library and fs-extra module promisified with bluebird
@node-kit/extra.fs
Some shared extra utilities for nodejs build-in fs modules
nodejs-fs-utils
NodeJs FileSystem (FS) extra utilities, walk, fsize ( folder / symlinks / files ), rmdirs,
file-system
Strengthen the ability of file system
npm install node-fs-extra
Typescript
Module System
Node Version
NPM Version
81.1
Supply Chain
98.5
Quality
74.3
Maintenance
100
Vulnerability
100
License
Total Downloads
2,295,690
Last Day
1,198
Last Week
5,674
Last Month
24,328
Last Year
339,507
Minified
Minified + Gzipped
Latest Version
0.8.2
Package Id
node-fs-extra@0.8.2
Size
8.40 kB
NPM Version
4.1.2
Node Version
7.5.0
Published on
Apr 09, 2017
Cumulative downloads
Total Downloads
Last Day
-14%
1,198
Compared to previous day
Last Week
-7.5%
5,674
Compared to previous week
Last Month
13.3%
24,328
Compared to previous month
Last Year
44.5%
339,507
Compared to previous year
This module adds a few extra file system methods that aren't included in the native fs
module. It is a drop in replacement for fs
.
I got tired of including mkdirp
, rimraf
, and cp -r
in most of my projects.
npm install --save fs-extra
fs-extra
is a drop in replacement for native fs
. All methods in fs
are unmodified and attached to fs-extra
.
You don't ever need to include the original fs
module again:
1var fs = require('fs') //this is no longer necessary
you can now do this:
1var fs = require('fs-extra'); //var fs = require('fs')
or if you prefer to make it clear that you're using fs-extra
and not fs
, you may want
to do this:
1//var fs = require('fs') 2var fse = require('fs-extra')
you can also keep, both, but it's redundant:
1var fs = require('fs') 2 , fse = require('fs-extra')
NOTE: You can still use the native Node.js methods. They are copied over to fs-extra
.
Copy a file or directory. The directory can have contents. Like cp -r
.
Sync: copySync()
Examples:
1var fs = require('fs-extra'); 2 3fs.copy('/tmp/myfile', '/tmp/mynewfile', function(err){ 4 if (err) return console.error(err); 5 6 console.log("success!") 7}); //copies file 8 9fs.copy('/tmp/mydir', '/tmp/mynewdir', function(err){ 10 if (err) return console.error(err); 11 12 console.log("success!") 13}); //copies directory, even if it has subdirectories or files
Creates a file. If the file that is requested to be created is in directories that do not exist, these directories are created. If the file already exists, it is NOT MODIFIED.
Sync: createFileSync()
Example:
1var fs = require('fs-extra') 2 3var file = '/tmp/this/path/does/not/exist/file.txt' 4 5fs.createFile(file, function(err) { 6 console.log(err); //null 7 //file has now been created, including the directory it is to be placed in 8})
Creates a directory. If the parent hierarchy doesn't exist, it's created. Like mkdir -p
.
Alias: mkdirp()
Sync: mkdirsSync()
/ mkdirpSync()
Examples:
1var fs = require('fs-extra'); 2 3fs.mkdirs('/tmp/some/long/path/that/prob/doesnt/exist', function(err){ 4 if (err) return console.error(err); 5 6 console.log("success!") 7}); 8 9fs.mkdirsSync('/tmp/another/path');
Almost the same as writeFile
, except that if the directory does not exist, it's created.
Sync: outputFileSync()
Example:
1var fs = require('fs-extra') 2var file = '/tmp/this/path/does/not/exist/file.txt' 3 4fs.outputFile(file, 'hello!', function(err) { 5 console.log(err); //null 6 7 fs.readFile(file, 'utf8', function(err, data) { 8 console.log(data); //hello! 9 }) 10})
Almost the same as writeJson
, except that if the directory does not exist, it's created.
Alias: `outputJSON()
Sync: outputJsonSync()
, outputJSONSync()
Example:
1var fs = require('fs-extra') 2var file = '/tmp/this/path/does/not/exist/file.txt' 3 4fs.outputJson(file, {name: 'JP'}, function(err) { 5 console.log(err); //null 6 7 fs.readJson(file, function(err, data) { 8 console.log(data.name); //'JP 9 }) 10})
Reads a JSON file and then parses it into an object. options
are the same that you'd pass to fs.readFile
.
Alias: readJSON()
Sync: readJsonSync()
, readJSONSync()
Example:
1var fs = require('fs-extra'); 2 3fs.readJson('./package.json', function(err, packageObj) { 4 console.log(packageObj.version); //0.1.3 5});
Removes a file or directory. The directory can have contents. Like rm -rf
.
Alias: delete()
Sync: removeSync()
/ deleteSync()
Examples:
1var fs = require('fs-extra'); 2 3fs.remove('/tmp/myfile', function(err){ 4 if (err) return console.error(err); 5 6 console.log("success!") 7}); 8 9fs.removeSync('/home/jprichardson'); //I just deleted my entire HOME directory.
Writes an object to a JSON file. options
are the same that you'd pass to fs.readFile
.
Alias: writeJSON()
Sync: writeJsonSync()
, writeJSONSync()
Example:
1var fs = require('fs-extra'); 2fs.writeJson('./package.json', {name: 'fs-extra'}, function(err){ 3 console.log(err); 4});
This contains items that I'm considering doing. I'd love community feedback.
rimraf
, ncp
, and mkdirps
code into this library. I'd like fs-extra to be a stable library that module authors
can depend upon. A bunch of other dependencies kinda sucks for modules/libraries. (I'm leaning against this now.)fse
prefix instead of fs
. This may encourage people to start using fse
as a prefix and hence make their code clearer that they're not using the native fs
. I'm very undecided on this one since fs-extra
is a drop in replacement for the native fs
. (I'm leaning against this now.)I put a lot of thought into the naming of these functions. Inspired by @coolaj86's request. So he deserves much of the credit for raising the issue. See discussion(s) here:
First, I believe that in as many cases as possible, the Node.js naming schemes should be chosen. However, there are problems with the Node.js own naming schemes.
For example, fs.readFile()
and fs.readdir()
: the F is capitalized in File and the d is not capitalized in dir. Perhaps a bit pedantic, but they should still be consistent. Also, Node.js has chosen a lot of POSIX naming schemes, which I believe is great. See: fs.mkdir()
, fs.rmdir()
, fs.chown()
, etc.
We have a dilemma though. How do you consistently name methods that perform the following POSIX commands: cp
, cp -r
, mkdir -p
, and rm -rf
?
My perspective: when in doubt, err on the side of simplicity. A directory is just a hierarchical grouping of directories and files. Consider that for a moment. So when you want to copy it or remove it, in most cases you'll want to copy or remove all of its contents. When you want to create a directory, if the directory that it's suppose to be contained in does not exist, then in most cases you'll want to create that too.
So, if you want to remove a file or a directory regardless of whether it has contents, just call fs.remove(path)
or its alias fs.delete(path)
. If you want to copy a file or a directory whether it has contents, just call fs.copy(source, destination)
. If you want to create a directory regardless of whether its parent directories exist, just call fs.mkdirs(path)
or fs.mkdirp(path)
.
fs-extra
wouldn't be possible without using the modules from the following authors:
If you want to contribute, please add a test. Also, don't change the version in package.json
.
<your name here>
Licensed under MIT
Copyright (c) 2011-2013 JP Richardson
No vulnerabilities found.
No security vulnerabilities found.